Telaah RPP oleh Shofi Marwanik
Diunggah oleh
OK LUBERTOTelaah RPP oleh Shofi Marwanik
Diunggah oleh
OK LUBERTOCommon questions
Didukung oleh AIRPP1's design was considered sufficient for achieving its learning indicators and objectives because the steps outlined in the lesson plan matched the indicators, which facilitated attaining the learning goals .
Recommendations for improving RPP1 could include ensuring material completeness, such as providing all necessary texts, refining the systematic inclusion of answer keys and varied question types, and correcting terminological inconsistencies to enhance clarity and educational effectiveness .
The review pointed out a discrepancy in RPP1's ejaan and format where 'kompetensi dasar' was stated at the top, instead of 'tujuan pembelajaran,' indicating an inconsistency in terminology used in different sections .
RPP1 was rated as lacking alignment with learning activities because it mentioned students listening to the novel 'Kisah Tanah Jawa' in the literacy activity, but the novel was not attached in the material sheet, indicating incomplete material provision .
RPP1 met the criteria of audience, behavior, condition, and degree effectively, as stated in the review. However, there was a specific issue noted regarding the use of a slanted line, which suggests there were minor formatting discrepancies .
RPP1 had systemic and logical shortcomings, such as the absence of an answer key and inadequate student worksheets. Additionally, only essay questions were provided despite the evaluation criteria including multiple-choice questions, leading to potential confusion in assessment .
RPP1's total score of 25 and an average of 3.5 indicate it performs at a basic to competent level. This suggests that while some criteria were met well, there are areas needing improvement for a higher quality of alignment with review standards .
RPP1 aligned well with the stages of the 2013 Curriculum scientific approach. The stages mentioned include observing, questioning, gathering, processing, and communicating, illustrating a solid structure following this educational model .
RPP1's systematic issues, such as lacking key materials and inconsistent evaluation items, suggest it is insufficiently effective in fulfilling curriculum requirements, necessitating improvements for better coherence and material availability to meet educational standards .
In the RUBRIK REVIEW RPP, the three aspects evaluated are cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects. These aspects are used to assess the indicators, ensuring there is a comprehensive evaluation of the lesson plans reviewed .