Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

For a solo or small-team project, a monorepo is usually simplest:

my-app/
├── client/ (React)
├── server/ (Express)
├── .gitignore
└── README.md
Pros: One clone, one set of issues/PRs, and a frontend and backend change that belong together land in a single commit. Versioning stays in sync.
Cons: CI and deploys need path filters so a frontend change doesn’t redeploy the backend. Permissions can’t be split per part.
Separate repos make sense when different teams own each part, they deploy on different schedules, or the API serves several clients.
Deployment: Most hosts (Vercel, Netlify, Render) let you set a root directory per service, so a monorepo deploys fine.

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by Nova-Developer18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Repositories The core of version-controlled code storage Question Ask and answer questions about GitHub features and usage Welcome 🎉 Used to greet and highlight first-time discussion participants. Welcome to the community! source:ui Discussions created via Community GitHub templates
2 participants