Skip to content

Start work on frontmatter tools (#1055)#1065

Closed
Meh10t wants to merge 0 commit into
oraios:mainfrom
Meh10t:feature/frontmatter-tools
Closed

Start work on frontmatter tools (#1055)#1065
Meh10t wants to merge 0 commit into
oraios:mainfrom
Meh10t:feature/frontmatter-tools

Conversation

@Meh10t

@Meh10t Meh10t commented Feb 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Work in progress for #1055.

Setting up branch and starting implementation of the opt-in frontmatter tools (MemoryAddFrontmatterTool and MemoryGetFrontmatterTool).

Further implementation will follow.

@opcode81

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Meh10t have you confirmed that the Kotlin download fix in b26acaa works, i.e. that this not only fixes the download but the LS is also operational?
If so, we should prioritise bringing this to main.

@Meh10t
Meh10t force-pushed the feature/frontmatter-tools branch from f3e7c92 to 4d81aa3 Compare February 23, 2026 14:25
@Meh10t

Meh10t commented Feb 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@Meh10t have you confirmed that the Kotlin download fix in b26acaa works, i.e. that this not only fixes the download but the LS is also operational? If so, we should prioritise bringing this to main.

You're right — the Kotlin LSP change was outside the scope of #1055.

I’ve removed that commit and reverted the branch to focus only on the frontmatter tools implementation.

Apologies for the confusion.

@Meh10t

Meh10t commented Feb 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@opcode81 Hi,

I just wanted to clarify the current situation regarding issue #1055.

I’m a bit confused about whether this issue is still assigned to me and if I should continue working on it. I opened PR #1065 and started implementing the nested memory paths and topic filtering, and I was planning to continue with the opt-in frontmatter tools (MemoryAddFrontmatterTool and MemoryGetFrontmatterTool) as discussed.

Could you please confirm if I should proceed with the full implementation, or if the direction has changed?

I’m happy to adapt my work to match the maintainers’ expectations.

Thanks!

@MischaPanch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi @Meh10t . As we discussed, the grouping has now been implemented but the frontmatter part has not and is assigned to you :)

@MischaPanch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The issue was closed by accident, I hadn't noticed that the PR was scheduled to close it. Sry about that

@Meh10t Meh10t closed this Feb 23, 2026
@Meh10t
Meh10t force-pushed the feature/frontmatter-tools branch from 5977baf to a0d2ed9 Compare February 23, 2026 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants