Skip to content

Update dependencies - #4117

Merged
mbg merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mbg/deps/1sep
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

mbg merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mbg/deps/1sep

Conversation

@mbg

@mbg mbg commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Updates a few dependencies in package-lock.json to newer versions.

Risk assessment

For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:

  • Low risk: Changes are fully under feature flags, or have been fully tested and validated in pre-production environments and are highly observable, or are documentation or test only.

Which use cases does this change impact?

Workflow types:

  • Advanced setup - Impacts users who have custom CodeQL workflows.
  • Managed - Impacts users with dynamic workflows (Default Setup, Code Quality, ...).

Products:

  • Code Scanning - The changes impact analyses when analysis-kinds: code-scanning.
  • Code Quality - The changes impact analyses when analysis-kinds: code-quality.
  • Other first-party - The changes impact other first-party analyses.
  • Third-party analyses - The changes affect the upload-sarif action.

Environments:

  • Dotcom - Impacts CodeQL workflows on github.com and/or GitHub Enterprise Cloud with Data Residency.
  • GHES - Impacts CodeQL workflows on GitHub Enterprise Server.

How did/will you validate this change?

  • Unit tests - I am depending on unit test coverage (i.e. tests in .test.ts files).
  • End-to-end tests - I am depending on PR checks (i.e. tests in pr-checks).

If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?

  • Rollback - Change can only be disabled by rolling back the release or releasing a new version with a fix.

How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?

  • Telemetry - I rely on existing telemetry or have made changes to the telemetry.
    • Dashboards - I will watch relevant dashboards for issues after the release. Consider whether this requires this change to be released at a particular time rather than as part of a regular release.
    • Alerts - New or existing monitors will trip if something goes wrong with this change.

Are there any special considerations for merging or releasing this change?

  • No special considerations - This change can be merged at any time.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Consider adding a changelog entry for this change.
  • Confirm the readme and docs have been updated if necessary.

@mbg mbg self-assigned this Sep 1, 2026
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings September 1, 2026 11:17
@mbg
mbg requested a review from a team as a code owner September 1, 2026 11:17

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.


đź’ˇ Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the size/XS Should be very easy to review label Sep 1, 2026
@mbg
mbg added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 2, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 276e2ce Sep 2, 2026
223 checks passed
@mbg
mbg deleted the mbg/deps/1sep branch September 2, 2026 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XS Should be very easy to review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants