Skip to content

Add PowerShell Core Architecture version to the PSVersionTable #8047

Closed

Description

I thinks it becomes necessary to include this information specially when creating a Github issue.
I want to create an RFC for this item.

Steps to reproduce

Expected behavior


Actual behavior


Environment data

> $PSVersionTable

Activity

  1. iSazonov commented on Oct 16, 2018

    @iSazonov
    Collaborator

    You could start here.

  2. bergmeister commented on Oct 16, 2018

    @bergmeister
    Contributor

    Do you mean the .net core runtime version by that? I would find that useful.

  3. iSazonov commented on Oct 17, 2018

    @iSazonov
    Collaborator

    the .net core runtime version

    I remember that this was rejected previously.

  4. vexx32 commented on Oct 17, 2018

    @vexx32
    Collaborator

    It seems to me that the request is more to do with whether PowerShell is running under x86, x64, ARM, etc., rather than the .NET core runtime version itself?

  5. MaximoTrinidad commented on Oct 17, 2018

    @MaximoTrinidad
    Author

    Bingo! +1 Rain Sallow (/u/ta11ow) (@vexx32)

    There's an existing issue where ... I don't see any issues with the 64 bit version, but seems that the 32 bit is behaving differently.

    So, when creating the Github issue, the it would be nice to have identify with architecture PowerShell is running on.

    :)

  6. bergmeister commented on Oct 17, 2018

    @bergmeister
    Contributor

    Hmm, I can see the point but there is much more involved that can play into it such as e.g. the architecture of the OS and hardware...
    We should differentiate between things that go into $PSVersionTable and the issue template

  7. vexx32 commented on Oct 17, 2018

    @vexx32
    Collaborator

    We can always extend the requested information beyond just $PSVersionTable

  8. added
    Issue-Discussionthe issue may not have a clear classification yet. The issue may generate an RFC or may be reclassif
    on Oct 18, 2018
  9. MaximoTrinidad commented on Oct 18, 2018

    @MaximoTrinidad
    Author

    At least... Add the session "$env:PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE" to the "Environment Data" section when create the issue in Github.

    I think this will be helpful enough and no changes are needed to the PSTableVersion is needed.

    :)

  10. iSazonov commented on Oct 18, 2018

    @iSazonov
    Collaborator

    Related #1635

  11. fMichaleczek commented on May 1, 2019

    @fMichaleczek
    Contributor

    PSVersionTable between Windows x86 and Windows x64 are identical (and there are 2 differents packages)

    Can we considerate adding an 'Architecture' property with $env:PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE value ?

  12. iSazonov commented on May 1, 2019

    @iSazonov
    Collaborator

    Flavien MICHALECZEK (@fMichaleczek) We discussed this previously and rejected - the conclusion was "best practice is to test features".

  13. microsoft-github-policy-service commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Contributor

    This issue has not had any activity in 6 months, if this is a bug please try to reproduce on the latest version of PowerShell and reopen a new issue and reference this issue if this is still a blocker for you.

  14. microsoft-github-policy-service commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Contributor

    This issue has not had any activity in 6 months, if this is a bug please try to reproduce on the latest version of PowerShell and reopen a new issue and reference this issue if this is still a blocker for you.

  15. microsoft-github-policy-service commented on Nov 16, 2023

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Contributor

    This issue has not had any activity in 6 months, if this is a bug please try to reproduce on the latest version of PowerShell and reopen a new issue and reference this issue if this is still a blocker for you.

  16. microsoft-github-policy-service commented on Nov 23, 2023

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Contributor

    This issue has been marked as "No Activity" as there has been no activity for 6 months. It has been closed for housekeeping purposes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Issue-Discussionthe issue may not have a clear classification yet. The issue may generate an RFC or may be reclassifResolution-No ActivityIssue has had no activity for 6 months or more

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions