Skip to content

Support for Ctrl+Z #3229

Closed as not planned
Closed as not planned

Description

This is strongly tied to #716, but we want to make sure these have independent work items.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Open PowerShell on Linux/macOS
  2. Hit Ctrl+Z

Expected behavior

Current running process is forked to bg

Actual behavior

PowerShell itself is forked to bg and the user is bounced back out to bash (or whatever is the default shell that handled Ctrl+Z)

Activity

  1. added this to the milestone on Mar 6, 2017
  2. modified the milestones: , 6.0.0-beta1 on Mar 15, 2017
  3. modified the milestones: , on May 15, 2017
  4. modified the milestones: , on Sep 6, 2017
  5. 49 remaining items

  6. superbonaci commented on Feb 26, 2025

    @superbonaci

    Doesn't Stop-Process do just that?

  7. superbonaci commented on Feb 26, 2025

    @superbonaci

    Or maybe PsSuspend this is what I'm talking about.

  8. microsoft-github-policy-service commented on Feb 27, 2025

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Contributor

    This issue has been marked as declined and has not had any activity for 1 day. It has been closed for housekeeping purposes.

  9. moved this from In progress to Done in Shellon Feb 27, 2025
  10. microsoft-github-policy-service commented on Feb 27, 2025

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Contributor

    📣 Hey Joey Aiello (@joeyaiello), how did we do? We would love to hear your feedback with the link below! 🗣️

    🔗 https://aka.ms/PSRepoFeedback

  11. beedell-roke commented on Feb 27, 2025

    @beedell-roke
  12. Lite5h4dow commented on Feb 27, 2025

    @Lite5h4dow

    #3229 (comment)

    This isn't completed.

    Because they aren't going to implement it.

  13. beedell-roke commented on Feb 27, 2025

    @beedell-roke
  14. Lite5h4dow commented on Feb 27, 2025

    @Lite5h4dow

    #3229 (comment)

    LiteLotus (@Lite5h4dow), that's made evident in the thread. What's not evident is why this has been closed as completed instead of unplanned.

    Probably a missclick. Does it really matter?

  15. beedell-roke commented on Feb 27, 2025

    @beedell-roke
  16. SeeminglyScience commented on Feb 28, 2025

    @SeeminglyScience
    Contributor

    It's just the default for the bot that closes it, we don't use the field for anything so it's just meaningless text. I'll ask about having it changed though (and am manually changing this one)

  17. microsoft-github-policy-service commented on Feb 28, 2025

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Contributor

    📣 Hey Joey Aiello (@joeyaiello), how did we do? We would love to hear your feedback with the link below! 🗣️

    🔗 https://aka.ms/PSRepoFeedback

  18. beedell-roke commented on Feb 28, 2025

    @beedell-roke

    #3229 (comment)

    Patrick Meinecke (@SeeminglyScience), thank you. Might also be worth having it integrate with the new "close as duplicate" functionality whilst you're at it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Issue-Enhancementthe issue is more of a feature request than a bugResolution-DeclinedThe proposed feature is declined.WG-Enginecore PowerShell engine, interpreter, and runtimeWG-ReviewedA Working Group has reviewed this and made a recommendation

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    • Status
      Done

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions