Skip to content

MessageKit v1 Vision #2

Closed
Closed

Description

@SD10

I'll put together a Vision.md but for now here are some basic thoughts for v1.

Basic Features

  • Message Bubbles Incoming/Outgoing
  • Message Avatars
  • Basic Text Messages Support
  • Resizing Messages Based on Text Length
  • Input Bar With Send Button
  • Move Input Bar When Showing Keyboard

Other thoughts

  • Writing tests from the start is easier and provides more benefits than adding them later 👍

Feel free to discuss any thoughts on:

  • v1 features
  • API/Architecture
  • Anything you'd change from JSQMessagesViewController?

Please use bullet points to make things easier to digest

Activity

  1. jyounus commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @jyounus
    Member

    Regarding "Input Bar w/ Send & Attachment Buttons", I'm wondering if we should implement the "attachment" functionality into this lib (assuming it would open the gallery for the user to select a photo/multiple photos). What if we didn't go with this assumption and let the developers implement it themselves?

    Maybe they don't want to have a button for attachments, but rather some other functionality (lets say to record a small voice chat message). Instead what we could do, is provide an easy way for devs to add their own custom buttons and their own custom code when the user taps on it.

    I'm just thinking about making MK as flexible and customisable as possible, without "hardcoding" too many things (like opening the photo gallery and dealing with the implementation, that should be up to the devs to handle it themselves imo). MK should just focus on the core UI for the actual Messages ViewController.

    Another thing I could think of is making the "Input Bar" changeable. We can provide a default implementation with a basic input bar and send button, but devs can easily "plug in" their own custom implementation of it (using protocols). They might want to have fancier animations (expand and shrink the input textfield based on whether or not it is focused etc).

    I don't know, it's open for discussion. Maybe I'm just over-complicating things here. :)

    I would definitely be for writing tests from the very beginning. 👍

    I would also like to avoid the Massive View Controller approach that JSQMessagesViewController took and break things down into smaller, maintainable classes.

    @jessesquires I remember reading a few times that you wanted to update the architecture of JSQMVC eventually but never got around to it. Did you ever start with that? I guess what I'm asking is did you ever start thinking about how you'd break the huge VC down into smaller pieces? If so, it would be great if you could share your thoughts about it. :)

  2. SD10 commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    @jyounus We have to start with something small and then add features from there. Just like Rome, JSQMVC wasn't built in one day 😂

    • Features such as photo picking or any other complex media items are out of scope for v1.

    • I really just want to flesh out the core components:

      • MessagesController & MessagesCollectionView
      • Layout & Bubbles
      • Delegate & Datasource API

    Two more things:

    • Let's try to use bullet points to make discussions easier to digest.
    • Let's not ping Jesse too much 😅 He's likely immune to it but he deprecated JSQMVC for a reason.
  3. ay5000 commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @ay5000
    1. Similar to the proposed changes in v8.0 of JSQMessagesViewController treat each cell as a section instead of a row.

    2. Add support for message clustering ala Facebook, I've done this on my fork of JSQMessagesViewController.

    3. Perhaps support AsyncDisplayKit? https://github.com/eBay/NMessenger is built with AsyncDisplayKit and has quite a few stars.

  4. SD10 commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    @ay5000 Thanks for bringing up the issue of treating cells as sections instead of items. These are just the things I'm looking for.

    I'm not familiar with message clustering but it's something we can look at.

    I'm really interested in AsyncDisplayKit but I think this would have to be an opt in feature. The goal is to limit dependencies and keep the barrier to entry low.

  5. efremidze commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @efremidze

    Do we want to force bubbles or should we allow for SlackTextViewController like cells?

  6. jessesquires commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @jessesquires
    Member

    Major things to address from JSQMVC (some of these are noted above, but I'll reiterate):

    • avoid the "massive view controller" problem, in particular make dataSource/delegates separate objects, make a separate controller to handle UIMenuController stuff
    • make custom dataSource/delegate protocol (like JSQMVC) but do not inherit from UICollectionViewDataSource/Delegate. (yes, this would give you 2 dataSources and 2 delegates. trust me, this will be easier and more flexible. it will also allow clients to use something like IGListKit, which owns the UICollectionView... components)
    • I would avoid clustering and other advanced things for v1
    • Do not use UITextView. It has a number of problems. I'd start with UILabel, then maybe try TTTAttributedLabel (although this project is suffering from neglect, too. perhaps a new project under the MessageKit org could "re-write" this)
    • Make the dataSource section-based, meaning each message is in it's own section rather than having 1 section with 0 to N items. Specifically, this will make message bubble headers/footers way easier (in fact, trivial) to implement, which brings me to...
    • The message bubble cells should only contain the bubble (with text/image/etc) and avatar. The timestamp, username, delivery status, read status, etc. should be their own cells or supplementary views (headers/footers) for the section
    • As @SD10 mentions, I would try to avoid dependencies. In fact, if v1 doesn't have any, I think that would be great
    • RE: message bubbles above, I would not use images. I would just use rounded-rect UIView/CALayer. The image assets added bloat to the lib. If the bubble is just a view, clients can easily customize
    • Finally, I think the thing that really made JSQMVC great was that it provided customization hooks for mostly everything, but also provided sensible defaults. (Example: you could provide your own bubbles, or just use the default bubbles.) This made it easy to get started and have something working very quickly, with customization coming later little by little.

    Hope this helps! 😊 If anything is unclear, let me know!

  7. jessesquires commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @jessesquires
    Member

    just discovered this, which might be of interest: https://github.com/darrarski/Messages-iOS

  8. SD10 commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    @jessesquires This is some priceless advice 👏 👍 I'm good on every point but just a bit lost on having the 2 dataSource and 2 delegate protocols. I'm also not familiar with IGListKit... yet 😅

    @efremidze I don't want to force anything. We can default to bubbles for nostalgic reasons, but the user should be able to override as much as possible.

  9. jessesquires commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @jessesquires
    Member

    @SD10 so you would have:

    var messagesDataSource: MessagesDataSource
    var messagesDelegate: MessagesDelegate
    
    var dataSource: UICollectionViewDataSource
    var delegate: UICollectionViewDelegate

    i.e., keep them all separate.

    Which reminds me, I'd strongly recommend using UICollectionViewController too, actually. By default, this implements the dataSource/delegate -- however, you can create your own class that conforms to these and re-assign self.collectionView.dataSource = myDataSourceObject

  10. MacMeDan commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @MacMeDan
    Contributor

    Guys this is awesome! I actually made my own MessagesKit Project but I think you have a good thing going here and would love to be apart of it. I have spent the last 2 years working with JSQMessagesViewController and was supper stoked to get MessagesKit up and running. I like all the ideas that have been shared here and would encourage more discussions to be broken off of here and continued but would urge that we bring this one to a very simplistic V1. This week has been a rollercoaster trying to figure out how to get this effort started and how to get this going and after reading through what has been shared I have thought and continue to think the most important thing is ease of use.

    Often times this is the first framework that people will use to get into development on iOS and there is nothing more frustrating then not being able to even get it to build. So I would propose we put together the core ideals of this project and how it will be developed.

    1. Everything that can have a default should but also is customizable.

    I would also purpose that we make it easy for people who would like to contribute to do so. Starter Tasks are a great way to grow the community and to get others to get involved. Creating Tasks that help outline what needs to be built that can be picked up by anyone would be awesome. I also think it would be nice to make sure no one gets overloaded. I know I cannot devote 8hr a day to this (even tho I want to) to get it back to where it was.

    Some guidelines and code standards would be nice to get in place now before too many things get started.

    I would go so far as to suggest that

    • Input Bar w/ Send & Attachment Buttons

    becomes

    • Input Bar w/ Send Button

    because that is the bare minimum needed to do chat.

  11. SD10 commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    @jessesquires Sorry, I guess I was more concerned about the two sets of protocols and their relationships.

    It looks like we would default to calling messageForItem(indexPath:) inside of collectionView(cellForItemAt:) and configure the cell? I'm just wondering if this relationship is ok based on your suggestions -- essentially, you're only suggesting we don't implement an inheritance relationship.

    public protocol MessagesDataSource {   
        func messageForItem(at indexPath: IndexPath, in collectionView: UICollectionView) -> MessageType
    }
    
    extension MessagesViewController: UICollectionViewDataSource {
    
        collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView, cellForItemAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UICollectionViewCell {
            let messageType = messagesViewControllerDataSource.messageForItem(at: indexPath, in: collectionView)
            // configure and return MessagesCell based on message type
        }
    }

    The only question that ever really stuck out to me is why you made the design choice to have a JSQMVCDataSource method that returns data instead of a UICollectionViewCell subclass. I have some ideas but this post is getting too long to guess.

  12. SD10 commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    @MacMeDan Welcome, we would love to have you!

    I completely agree with you on ease of use. JSQMVC was the 2nd third party library I ever used 😃.

    Starter tasks, task outlines, code standards. These are all important to me as well. I think shipping a basic v1 will set some standards and make it easier for others to contribute. It's easier to build features than the foundation.

    I definitely agree with your vision of dropping the attachment button for v1. It should be a barebones core of the project.

    As for making sure no one gets overloaded, this is open source, and while sometimes it may feel like a job for a maintainer -- ultimately the goal is to have fun. If anyone ever feels like too much is being asked of them, just say something 😃

  13. jessesquires commented on Jul 20, 2017

    @jessesquires
    Member

    @SD10

    The only question that ever really stuck out to me is why you made the design choice to have a JSQMVCDataSource method that returns data instead of a UICollectionViewCell subclass.

    This was to follow the principle of "sensible defaults, but customization hooks". If you never wanted to customize cells (beyond bubble color), you never had to touch that -- just return your models. 😄

  14. pmusolino commented on Jul 24, 2017

    @pmusolino

    What about the idea of populating the conversation tableview from the top? I imagine a pagination from bottom to top, but the problem with dynamic cells is to maintain the offset to the cell showed when the pagination starts.

  15. 1 remaining item

  16. dusty-commits commented on Jul 24, 2017

    @dusty-commits

    Just a couple high level suggestions:

    • Find a way to include NSAttributedString. I don't know if this is related, but @jessesquires, can you tell us what problems you had with UITextView? The known issues may help guide some early decisions. I've met some performance issues with pushing the limits of NSAttributedString, but there is a need for data detectors (aka clickable links) from the get-go.
    • Small nitpick, but instead of referring to incoming and outgoing bubbles/messages, it helps API consumers to think of things as left/right. Or even better... leading/trailing. Just an observation that created a little friction when I first used it.
    • Although I don't have any specific suggestions, I think some philosophical discussions should be had on the customization. Like Jesse said, "customization hooks for mostly everything, but also provided sensible defaults", but I would probably dial that up just a bit. I think with Swift protocols/decorators/whatever, we can provide lots of customization and not only sensible defaults, but a plugin architecture where the community can provide nonintrusive drop-in customizations for styling and behavior.
    • +1 on the idea of generating the bubble with CALayer/Core Graphics instead of an image.
  17. LucianoPAlmeida commented on Jul 25, 2017

    @LucianoPAlmeida

    Hey, @SD10 what about a Slack channel for the MessageKit community?

  18. towry commented on Jul 25, 2017

    @towry

    About slack channel see #6

  19. ampatalas commented on Jul 25, 2017

    @ampatalas

    I feel like the scope for v1, included in the first post in this thread is pretty great. It has all the basic functionalities needed to get the project running, and other stuff can be easily build off that.

    For the level of customization for the first version, I can think of colors, paddings, margins, corner radius, and borders of message bubbles, and conversation background.

  20. mszaro commented on Jul 26, 2017

    @mszaro

    Edit: Unfortunately due to the decisions to drop Objective-C compatibility, I can't justify my (or my company's) time contributing to this project. Wishing good luck to all involved.

  21. SD10 commented on Jul 26, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    @mszaro I'm sorry but I don't think Obj-C friendly APIs will be a core goal of this project. For those who need an Obj-C messaging library, JSQMessagesViewController will still be great for a long time to come. The goal is to write this project with an idiomatic Swift API. That being said, this is a community and I'm open to discussion. It's just low priority for me right now.

  22. TheDarkCode commented on Jul 26, 2017

    @TheDarkCode

    Just to carryover my comments from #1 into this issue so it is properly accounted for here since not everyone reads every comment on issues.

    I am in complete agreement with @SD10 about making this 100% focused on Swift and not Objective-C.

    Every discussion on these issues is about JSQ. Sure, that is a prime inspirational basis for this project, but does that mean we let the muse dictate the future instead of the artists?

    We need to ask ourselves: what would a luddite do? Then go with the opposite.

  23. SD10 commented on Jul 26, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    Just a few more things to go for v0.1.0:

    • Move Input Bar When Showing Keyboard
    • Clean up access control
    • Deciding what to expose via delegates for customization
  24. darrarski commented on Jul 26, 2017

    @darrarski

    @SD10 you don't have to manage input bar's layout manually. You can add it to view controller as a input accessory view. It will stick to the keyboard as in stock Messages app. You can check my example implementation.

  25. SD10 commented on Jul 26, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    @darrarski interesting 👍 but you don't seem to have the input bar pinned to the bottom of the UIViewController, do you? The input bar can't be both a subview of my main view and an input accessory view.

  26. darrarski commented on Jul 26, 2017

    @darrarski

    @SD10 that's correct. I didn't added it as a subview to view controller's view. If you use it as a input accessory view, it will appear just like in Messages app. I think this is the best way to achieve correct behavior of the input field.

  27. SD10 commented on Jul 26, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    @darrarski wow I'm behind the times 😅 thanks for the tip!

  28. SD10 commented on Jul 27, 2017

    @SD10
    MemberAuthor

    Thank you everyone for your suggestions ❤️
    I just released v0.1.0 and I'm closing this in favor of #12.

  29. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions