Devis construction villa R+1 Ouagadougou
Devis construction villa R+1 Ouagadougou
The difference might not stem from the unit price but from quantity used: 32 m³ for foundation and 32 m³ for R+1, both priced at 15,000 per m³ . However, if observed, a discrepancy would suggest possible variation in sourcing, transportation, or quality required at different construction stages, impacting overall cost efficiency.
Fer de 10 is used primarily for chainages, which are crucial in structural reinforcement at various stages . Fer de 8 is used for bay supports, which are less critical but necessary for window or door stability . The differing potential impacts reflect the balance between ensuring structural integrity with fer de 10 in critical areas and cost efficiency with fer de 8.
In the foundation phase, the cost of sand is 64 m³ at 10,500 per m³, totaling 672,000 . For the R+1 level, 64 m³ of sand is used at the same unit cost, totaling another 672,000 . The quantity used remains the same, and so does the cost, but it directly contributes to separate phases of the construction process.
Several factors contribute to this cost: high material quantities like cement and fer for both foundation and structural components, fixed costs like FF for R+1 and RDC at CFA 6,000,000 , and constant unit costs which could increase due to inflation or logistics. Detailed planning with cost-effective material use can aid in managing these expenses.
Brique creux de 15 is used mainly at basement and R+1 levels, with costs at 702,000 CFA and 351,000 CFA respectively . Its use in structural walls impacts both load distribution efficiency and cost, reinforcing budget focus on essential weight-bearing and partition elements.
The project uses different dosages of concrete for various components: isolée and potelets use 350 kg/m³, cyclopean concrete for isolated footings uses 250 kg/m³, and floor slabs use 150 kg/m³. The predominant use of 350 kg/m³ concrete for structural components ensures structural integrity, but this may not be as cost-effective for non-load-bearing elements . Optimization could potentially reduce costs without compromising safety.
The total quantity of fer de 12 used is the sum of fer de 12 for semelle isolée, potelets, poteaux, and poutre. Therefore, it is 40 u (semelle isolée) + 30 u (potelets) + 60 u (poteaux) + 60 u (poutre) = 190 u .
Cailloux sauvage (wild stones) may offer cost benefits due to local availability, reducing transportation costs and providing natural drainage. However, inconsistencies in shape and size could lead to non-uniformity and potential structural weaknesses if not correctly integrated with concrete . The balance between cost and structural integrity is crucial.
Fer de 6 is employed in beam clamps, column reinforcements, and grid flooring, which are crucial for providing shear resistance and maintaining tension integrity across the structure. Its strategic use in high-stress zones enhances stability against lateral forces and structural loading shifts . This foundational role underscores its necessity in maintaining architectural safety standards.
Using a lower dosage for floor slabs is likely a cost-efficiency decision, as these components need sufficient strength but don't bear as much load as structural beams or columns, allowing for cost savings without compromising overall structural integrity significantly . This strategic material selection ensures budget effectiveness.