0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
4 vues4 pages

Données de débits mensuels du Río Quiroz

Le document contient les débits moyens mensuels en mètres cubes par seconde d'une station hydrométrique au Pérou sur la rivière Quiroz entre 1973 et 2023.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
Nous prenons très au sérieux les droits relatifs au contenu. Si vous pensez qu’il s’agit de votre contenu, signalez une atteinte au droit d’auteur ici.
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez aux formats XLSX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
4 vues4 pages

Données de débits mensuels du Río Quiroz

Le document contient les débits moyens mensuels en mètres cubes par seconde d'une station hydrométrique au Pérou sur la rivière Quiroz entre 1973 et 2023.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
Nous prenons très au sérieux les droits relatifs au contenu. Si vous pensez qu’il s’agit de votre contenu, signalez une atteinte au droit d’auteur ici.
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez aux formats XLSX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

PROYECTO CHIRA-PIURA

DIVISION DE HIDROMETEOROLOGIA
ESTACION: PARAJE GRANDE RIO QUIROZ (Aguas Abajo de Toma de Z
LAT.: 04°37'50" LONG.: 79°54'48" ALT.: 555 MSNM.

DESCARGAS MEDIAS MENSUALES EN M3/S.


AÑO ENR FEB MAR ABR MAY JUN JUL
1973
1974 6.8 14.8 6.7 2.6 3.4 2.7 7.8
1975 5.9 17.8 41.6 60.8 7.2 35.8 8.3
1976 12.4 16.1 64.6 54.7 25.2 30.5 6.3
1977 4.6 13.7 19.5 35.2 14.1 9.4 8.3
1978 1.4 2.1 9.0 2.9 0.9 2.7 0.8
1979 0.6 0.9 12.9 3.6 2.4 0.8 0.6
1980 0.8 2.0 2.4 9.4 2.0 1.5 6.1
1981 2.0 6.2 40.0 13.2 3.4 3.8 1.2
1982 0.8 1.5 2.2 6.6 1.0 0.4 0.4
1983 44.7 80.7 107.1 113.8 114.3 71.6 34.4
1984 5.4 70.6 111.0 61.4 9.5 31.2 11.5
1985 10.3 2.3 3.7 1.6 4.4 1.5 1.3
1986 1.5 4.5 3.0 8.3 4.8 1.4 1.5
1987 5.0 5.6 7.5 12.9 10.3 3.2 6.1
1988 2.7 7.8 2.2 4.8 2.8 1.4 1.3
1989 4.4 25.4 22.6 40.0 8.3 4.3 1.3
1990 2.0 1.8 3.9 5.2 3.5 2.6 1.8
1991 1.0 12.9 18.1 8.9 5.2 3.8 2.9
1992 2.7 3.4 11.4 52.7 9.6 8.4 4.5
1993 1.4 20.1 53.4 83.4 21.8 22.4 5.8
1994 8.3 63.8 17.9 52.7 17.3 14.7 8.7
1995 5.3 3.4 3.9 6.0 5.2 3.5 2.6
1996 3.5 3.5 11.6 2.7 1.9 1.5 1.6
1997 1.3 7.0 6.2 5.2 3.3 2.0 1.8
1998 9.2 34.5 130.4 154.3 107.0 29.0 11.8
1999 8.7 53.9 139.1 56.5 41.3 13.7 12.4
2000 22.5 108.9 103.0 56.9 36.2 19.6
2001 8.1 27.5 54.2 57.8 26.2 33.7 15.4
2002 4.2 24.9 38.7 48.8 30.6 17.1 10.8
2003 8.6 8.6 12.4 14.6 12.9 9.2 8.4
2004 6.7 6.6 7.1 6.9 5.8
2005 34.4 18.7 8.8
2006 62.5 55.9
2007 10.5 11.5
2008 7.5 66.7 106.5 100.5 41.9 19.7 14.1
2009 92.2 103.3 129.5 101.2 45.4 37.7 44.3
2010 5.7 15.5 29.6 32.3 24.3 9.4 3.8
2011 1.8 20.3 4.0 32.1 11.7 5.4 15.6
2012 47.9 117.4 79.9 59.2 36.3 23.1 13.9
2013 20.6 2.9 5.2 2.8 2.9 3.5 3.1
2014 1.3 2.0 18.8 2.2 5.2 8.3 3.1
2015 5.1 4.5 43.9 100.3 44.0 56.5 16.3
2016 3.8 16.4 44.3 48.1 21.7 12.7 13.9
2017 6.0 15.2 194.6 165.4 102.4 59.6 21.1
2018 7.6 9.8 6.3 13.2 4.6 1.3 0.4
2019 14.9 38.8 58.9 44.0 23.4 25.4 6.3
2020 7.6 5.8 8.0 11.3 13.7 9.8 11.5
2021 8.0 8.9 37.6 22.8 21.4 10.0 10.4
2022 1.5 6.7 39.8 38.0 13.9 8.6 14.7
2023 5.1 8.4 59.1 57.6 38.8 22.2 9.0

MAX 92.2 117.4 194.6 165.4 114.3 71.6 44.3


MED 9.4 22.4 40.6 40.2 21.1 15.6 8.7
MIN 0.6 0.9 2.2 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.4
[Link]ño 8.5 20.7 37.2 36.0 16.9 14.0 8.0
Masa(MMC) 22.8 50.1 99.5 93.4 45.3 36.2 21.3
Masa(MMC) 79.2 75.5 32.0
NOTA.- ESPACIO EN BLANCO = SIN DATO.
A-PIURA
TEOROLOGIA
(Aguas Abajo de Toma de Zamba)
ALT.: 555 MSNM.

MENSUALES EN M3/S.
AGO SET OCT NOV DIC ANUAL
2.6 1.7 3.0 19.7
4.6 4.4 4.4 4.7 10.1 6.1
5.6 5.6 1.8 1.6 5.5 16.5
7.2 2.2 2.4 7.1 1.4 19.2
3.6 2.4 1.7 1.6 1.7 9.7
1.6 0.6 3.2 0.4 0.5 2.2
0.6 0.7 2.9 1.0 0.7 2.3
0.2 0.2 0.9 4.1 8.2 3.2
0.6 1.0 0.9 1.4 0.9 6.2
0.4 0.8 1.0 5.1 8.9 2.4
22.3 22.0 30.9 13.9 13.1 55.7
9.6 1.7 2.1 9.5 26.4 29.2
1.3 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.9 2.5
0.8 1.1 0.8 0.6 1.4 2.5
2.3 1.3 1.3 0.9 1.3 4.8
0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 2.2
1.2 1.3 1.6 1.1 1.0 9.4
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.2
2.7 4.4 2.6 1.6 1.0 5.4
7.3 5.6 2.6 1.3 1.6 9.3
1.5 0.6 2.1 0.7 2.4 18.0
9.5 4.2 4.2 2.6 4.8 17.4
1.7 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.6 3.3
1.6 1.8 3.0 1.6 1.4 3.0
1.5 1.5 1.6 2.1 4.2 3.1
9.0 3.4 5.5 6.5 4.4 42.1
6.0 3.5 37.2
57.8
13.9 7.1 5.2 5.8 6.0 21.7
7.3 7.1 11.9 10.1 8.2 18.3
6.4 5.1 4.6 4.6 5.4 8.4
6.6
20.6
59.2
11.0
4.9 3.1 3.2 7.0 5.0 31.7
32.8 27.2 23.1 17.5 20.5 56.2
3.1 3.3 3.0 3.1 1.3 11.2
2.9 3.9 2.9 4.7 5.4 9.2
6.2 4.1 4.1 5.5 9.8 34.0
1.8 1.0 3.0 0.3 0.4 4.0
0.9 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.4 3.7
2.4 1.6 1.6 0.5 3.2 23.3
2.3 1.0 0.6 1.2 0.9 13.9
5.5 3.2 3.1 1.8 1.7 48.3
0.3 0.2 0.3 2.4 1.9 4.0
5.6 3.4 5.4 0.7 10.9 19.8
3.0 2.8 0.3 0.1 6.2 6.7
6.7 5.0 4.0 1.7 1.4 11.5
6.5 0.5 4.6 0.5 1.0 11.4
28.6

32.8 27.2 30.9 17.5 26.4 59.2


4.8 3.5 3.7 3.4 5.1 16.7
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 2.2
4.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 4.9 15.3
11.5 8.0 8.1 7.9 13.1 417.2
186.7

Common questions

Alimenté par l’IA

Extreme weather events like El Niño have a pronounced impact on the discharge patterns of the Chira-Piura river, leading to drastic increases in water discharge. During El Niño years, such as 1983 and 1998, the monthly discharges reach exceptionally high values far exceeding the averages, notably in March and April. This suggests that during El Niño events, rainfall significantly increases, causing higher river flows and potential flooding . These impacts underscore the river system's sensitivity to climatic fluctuations.

Fluctuations in the Chira-Piura river discharge can lead to various environmental and socio-economic impacts. Environmentally, high discharge rates during El Niño years can cause flooding, loss of biodiversity, and habitat disruption. Socio-economically, flooding might result in property and infrastructure damage, negatively impacting agriculture, which relies heavily on consistent water availability. On the other hand, low discharge periods can lead to water scarcity, affecting irrigation and community water supply . Long-term planning and adaptive strategies are critical for mitigating these impacts.

The monthly water discharge rates of the Chira-Piura river system exhibit significant variability between years, with peaks often corresponding to specific months. Major peaks are noticeable during the early months of the year such as March and April, frequently associated with seasonal rainfall and potential El Niño phenomena. For example, in 1983 and 1998, significant increases in discharge in these months correlate with documented strong El Niño events . These discharge patterns highlight the river's response to climatic variations over time.

The maximum recorded discharge for March is 194.6 m3/s, highlighting a peak capacity response typically associated with El Niño years. This suggests significant hydrological stress on the Chira-Piura river system during such periods, potentially leading to localized flooding and infrastructure challenges. The implications for the region include the need for robust flood management strategies and infrastructure capable of handling such extreme discharge events .

Non-El Niño years exhibit considerably lower average monthly discharge rates compared to El Niño years. For instance, the median discharge rates during non-El Niño years are substantially lower across all months when contrasted with the spikes seen in El Niño years like 1983 or 1998. This indicates that non-El Niño years typically experience more stable but lower discharge compared to the enhanced rainfalls during El Niño events that drive larger flow rates .

Variability in water discharge presents numerous challenges for water resource management in the Chira-Piura basin. Managers must balance water supply for agricultural, industrial, and human consumption while ensuring flood control during peak discharges and maintaining ecological health during low flow periods. In years of high variability, such as during El Niño events, the challenge is intensified, requiring adaptable management practices and infrastructure that can cope with both extremes .

Statistical measures such as median and mean discharge values indicate typical discharge behavior during non-extreme years. For the Chira-Piura river, the median discharge rates for non-El Niño years provide a baseline of expected flows under typical conditions, which are significantly lower than those in El Niño years. These measures help in planning and predicting river behavior in years without major climatic anomalies .

The maximum discharge values, particularly during months like March, significantly impact flood risk management strategies in the Chira-Piura region. High discharge rates elevate flood risks, which necessitates enhanced flood forecasting, community preparedness, and infrastructure resilience to mitigate damage. Regional planners must prioritize investments in these areas to manage anticipated risks better. The extreme values emphasize the need for integrated hydrological data analysis and responsive urban planning .

The average monthly water discharge in non-El Niño years is typically lower compared to the median discharge during El Niño years, suggesting significant hydrological variability driven by climatic events. This variability implies that El Niño increases both the amplitude and frequency of discharge rates, resulting in higher median values for months such as March and April in affected years . This discrepancy highlights the critical influence of climate on hydrological extremes.

The long-term annual discharge data of the Chira-Piura river system show periods of high variability with no consistent increasing or decreasing trend over the decades. High discharge years coincide with El Niño occurrences, while the data trend towards lower variability and discharge in non-El Niño years. These trends highlight the impact of significant climatic events overshadowing any long-term trends in discharge data .

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi