0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
10 vistas5 páginas

Optimización de producción de motores eléctricos

Ejercicio del método simplex

Cargado por

Miguel Cayetano
Derechos de autor
© All Rights Reserved
Nos tomamos en serio los derechos de los contenidos. Si sospechas que se trata de tu contenido, reclámalo aquí.
Formatos disponibles
Descarga como DOCX, PDF, TXT o lee en línea desde Scribd
0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
10 vistas5 páginas

Optimización de producción de motores eléctricos

Ejercicio del método simplex

Cargado por

Miguel Cayetano
Derechos de autor
© All Rights Reserved
Nos tomamos en serio los derechos de los contenidos. Si sospechas que se trata de tu contenido, reclámalo aquí.
Formatos disponibles
Descarga como DOCX, PDF, TXT o lee en línea desde Scribd

5. Electra produce dos clases de motores eléctricos, cada uno en una línea de producción aparte.

Las capacidades diarias de las dos líneas son 600 y 750 motores respectivamente. El
motor tipo 1 usa 10 unidades de cierto tipo de componente electrónico, y el motor tipo 2
usa 8 unidades del mismo componente. El proveedor de dicho componente puede
suministrar 8000 piezas por día. Las utilidades son 60 Bs por cada motor de tipo 1 y 40 Bs
por cada motor de tipo 2. Determine la producción diaria óptima.

Solución:

Variables: X1: motores tipo 1 X2: motores tipo 2

Restricciones:

Línea A: X1 ≤
600 Línea B: X2
≤ 750
Componente electrónico: 10X1 + 8X2 ≤
8000 No negatividad: X1 ≥ 0 X2 ≥ 0

Función objetivo: Maximizar Z = 60X1 +40X2

Método de solución: Simplex

Z - 60X1 - 40X2 = 0
X1 + S1 = 600
X2 + S2 = 750
10X1 + 8X2 + S3 = 8000

Matriz inicial:
V. Básica Z X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 Solución
Z 1 -60 -40 0 0 0 0
S1 0 1 0 1 0 0 600
S2 0 0 1 0 1 0 750
S3 0 10 8 0 0 1 8000
Variables básicas: S1, S2, S3 (Inicialmente se toman las de holgura)
Variables no básicas: X1, X2

Selección de la variable de entrada aplicando la condición de optimalidad.

V. Básica Z X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 Solución
Z 1 -60 -40 0 0 0 0
S1 0 1 0 1 0 0 600
S2 0 0 1 0 1 0 750
S3 0 10 8 0 0 1 8000

Columna pivote
Variable de entrada: X1
Selección de la variable de salida aplicando la condición de factibilidad.

Descargado por Miguel Sanchez (miguelcayetano2004@[Link])


Entra Razón
V. Básica X1 Solución
S1 1 600 600/1 = 600
S2 0 750 750/0
S3 10 8000 8000/10 = 800
Variable de salida: S1

V. Básica Z X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 Solución
Z 1 -60 -40 0 0 0 0
S1 0 1 0 1 0 0 600
S2 0 0 1 0 1 0 750
S3 0 10 8 0 0 1 8000

Renglón pivote Elemento pivote

𝑅𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑝𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙


𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑝𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒 = 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒
0𝑍 + 𝑋1 + 0𝑋2 + 𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 600
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑝𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒 = 1
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑝𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒 = 0𝑍 + 𝑋1 + 0𝑋2 + 𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 600

𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 = 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 − [(𝐶𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑛 𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑎


𝑝𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒)𝑥(𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑝𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒)]

𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑍 = 𝑍 − 60𝑋1 − 40𝑋2 + 0𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 0 − [(−60)𝑥(0𝑍 + 𝑋1 +


0𝑋2 + 𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 600)]
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑍 = 𝑍 − 60𝑋1 − 40𝑋2 + 0𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 0 + (0𝑍 + 60𝑋1 + 0𝑋2 +
60𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 36000)
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑍 = 𝑍 + 0𝑋1 − 40𝑋2 + 60𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 36000

𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑆2 = 0𝑍 + 0𝑋1 + 𝑋2 + 0𝑆1 + 𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 750 − [(0)𝑥(0𝑍 + 𝑋1 + 0𝑋2 +


𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 600)]
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑆2 = 0𝑍 + 0𝑋1 + 𝑋2 + 0𝑆1 + 𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 750 + (0𝑍 + 0𝑋1 + 0𝑋2 + 0𝑆1
+ 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 0)
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑆2 = 0𝑍 + 0𝑋1 + 𝑋2 + 0𝑆1 + 𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 750
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑆3 = 0𝑍 + 10𝑋1 + 8𝑋2 + 0𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 𝑆3 + 8000 − [(10)𝑥(0𝑍 + 𝑋1 +
0𝑋2 + 𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 0𝑆3 + 600)]
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑆3 = 0𝑍 + 10𝑋1 + 8𝑋2 + 0𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 𝑆3 + 8000 − 0𝑍 − 10𝑋1 − 0𝑋2 −
10𝑆1 − 0𝑆2 − 0𝑆3 − 6000
𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑙ó𝑛 𝑆3 = 0𝑍 + 0𝑋1 + 8𝑋2 − 10𝑆1 + 0𝑆2 + 𝑆3 + 2000

Matriz luego de la primera iteración:

V. Básica Z X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 Solución
Z 1 0 -40 60 0 0 36000
X1 0 1 0 1 0 0 600
S2 0 0 1 0 1 0 750
S3 0 0 8 -10 0 1 2000

Variables básicas: X1, S2, S3


Descargado por Miguel Sanchez (miguelcayetano2004@[Link])
Variables no básicas: S1, X2

Selección de la variable de entrada aplicando la condición de optimalidad.

V. Básica Z X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 Solución
Z 1 0 -40 60 0 0 36000
X1 0 1 0 1 0 0 600
S2 0 0 1 0 1 0 750
S3 0 0 8 -10 0 1 2000

Columna pivote
Variable de entrada: X2

Selección de la variable de salida aplicando la condición de factibilidad.


Entra
V. Básica X2 Solución Razón
X1 0 600 600/0
S2 1 750 750/1 = 750
S3 8 2000 2000/8 = 250
Variable de salida: S3

V. Básica Z X2 S1 S2 S3 Solución
X1 Z 1 -40 60 0 0 36000
0 0 1 0 0 600
X1 0 1 1
0 1 0 750
S32 0 0 8 -10 0 1 2000

Descargado por Miguel Sanchez (miguelcayetano2004@[Link])


Descargado por Miguel Sanchez (miguelcayetano2004@[Link])

Common questions

Con tecnología de IA

A rise in the market price of electronic components would increase the cost burden for Electra, potentially reducing profit margins unless the sales price of the motors is adjusted higher. Conversely, a decrease in component prices could decrease production costs and increase profitability with the current selling price. In either scenario, Electra's production plan must adapt to maintain cost-effectiveness, potentially altering production quantities and type distribution depending on relative profit changes for different motor types .

If the constraint on line A is increased, allowing more than 600 motors of type 1 per day, it could potentially increase Electra’s profitability. Since type 1 motors yield higher profit per unit (60 Bs compared to 40 Bs for type 2), maximizing their production within the new constraint could significantly enhance total profit, as long as it remains feasible within the scope of other limitations such as component availability .

Electra's daily production of electric motors is optimal when the production plan maximizes the total utility under the given constraints. The production constraints include: producing up to 600 motors of type 1, up to 750 motors of type 2, and not exceeding the supply of 8000 units of a certain electronic component (where each motor type 1 uses 10 units and each motor type 2 uses 8 units). The objective function to maximize is the profit, calculated as 60 Bs per motor of type 1 and 40 Bs per motor of type 2 .

Integrating predictive analytics into Electra’s production decision-making can significantly enhance operational efficiency by accurately forecasting demand and aligning production schedules accordingly. Analytics could optimize supply chain management, reducing overstock or shortages of components. These tools can also identify patterns and insights into machine performance or maintenance needs, thereby reducing downtime and increasing overall productivity. Strategic data use facilitates informed decisions on production allocation, anticipating market trends, and adjusting to dynamic conditions .

Slack variables are introduced into the constraints to convert inequalities into equations, which is necessary for applying the Simplex method. They represent unused resources: S1 for the unused capacity of line A, S2 for line B, and S3 for the unutilized components. Initially, these slack variables form the basic feasible solution along with the objective function. As iterations progress, these slack variables are adjusted to reflect the resources consumed by the production of type 1 and type 2 motors, guiding towards the optimal allocation .

Increasing the daily supply of electronic components would potentially allow Electra to increase the production of their motors, particularly if the current production is constrained by the component supply limit of 8000 units. This relaxation could enable producing more motors of either type, balancing towards higher output and profit given that more than 600 units of type 1 or 750 units of type 2 exceed the current component threshold and only if these additional productions still adhere to other existing constraints .

Electra could address capacity bottlenecks by implementing strategies like increasing automation to speed up production, optimizing labor allocation for better throughput, or upgrading machinery to handle more capacity. Lean manufacturing techniques could also be employed to reduce waste and improve workflow. Another strategy might include scheduling more shifts or redistributing production demands across different time frames to alleviate pressure on bottlenecked areas .

Electra could optimize resource utilization by employing adjustable allocation strategies that consider real-time constraints, like dynamically shifting the production mix between motor types depending on the demand and availability of materials. Another approach includes increasing efficiency to reduce wasted resources or developing negotiation with suppliers for more materials. Integrated optimization models leveraging predictive analytics could better forecast high-demand periods, thus enabling strategic scheduling and inventory management to maximize profits .

Setting a production target of 700 motors of type 1 exceeds the daily capacity of line A, which is 600, rendering this target infeasible. Additionally, this target would require 10600 units of the electronic component (700x10 + 600x8), which surpasses the daily availability of 8000 units of components. Hence, despite being within the capacity of line B (600 motors of type 2 is feasible), overall these targets are not achievable without violating several production constraints .

The Simplex method is used to find the optimal solution for linear programming problems such as Electra's production. It iteratively moves towards the maximum or minimum value of the objective function (in this case, maximizing Z = 60X1 + 40X2) while satisfying all the constraints, such as production limits and component availability. By systematic selection and rotation of pivot elements, the method explores feasible zones until achieving the highest profit, adjusting the production of type 1 and type 2 motors within defined limits .

También podría gustarte