Universidad Autonoma Gabriel Rene Moreno Facultad de Humanidades Carrera Ciencias de La Comunicación
Cargado por
Arnaldo JimenezUniversidad Autonoma Gabriel Rene Moreno Facultad de Humanidades Carrera Ciencias de La Comunicación
Cargado por
Arnaldo JimenezCommon questions
Con tecnología de IAThe survey results suggest that future electoral strategies at UAGRM should focus on increasing candidate visibility and communication of their proposals to the student body. Many students reported not knowing the candidates or their campaign promises, which led to a high percentage of votes for 'Ninguno de los candidatos.' To address this, candidates would need to devise strategies to effectively communicate their ideas and engage with students to increase awareness and understanding, thus ensuring a more informed voter base .
Based on survey insights, UAGRM candidates can improve their campaigning by increasing their visibility and making their proposals more accessible and understandable to students. This could involve leveraging social media platforms, organizing open forums, engaging in direct communication with students, and ensuring that their campaign materials clearly articulate their plans and the impact of these plans on the university. Additionally, fostering personal connections through meet-and-greet sessions or participatory events could further build trust and familiarity among potential voters .
The UAGRM survey's structure, administered in person with a sample of 64 students, reflected a high level of candidate unawareness. It included both male and female respondents with a majority being women, covering a representative age group of 20-25 years. The survey format, by directly engaging with students, highlighted the widespread lack of knowledge about candidates, as confirmed by the high percentage of votes for 'Ninguno de los candidatos,' showcasing the need for candidates to improve campaign outreach .
The lack of candidate knowledge among students profoundly influences their electoral decisions at UAGRM, as evidenced by 46% of survey respondents opting for 'Ninguno de los candidatos.' This lack of awareness leads to indecision and a tendency to default to a non-committal option, reflecting a gap in candidates' outreach and communication strategies. Ensuring that students are well-informed about candidates and their proposals is crucial to fostering active participation in the electoral process .
The age group of 20-25 years played a significant role in the survey outcomes about UAGRM elections because this demographic likely makes up a significant portion of the student body, who are expected to be directly impacted by the university administration and its policies. Their substantial vote of 'Ninguno de los candidatos' could indicate a disconnection between the candidates' campaign strategies and the concerns or awareness levels of younger voters .
The gender distribution of the respondents showed that 71% were women and 29% were men, indicating a higher female participation. Despite this skewed participation, the overall opinion was consistent across genders with Reinerio Vargas receiving 15% support, Juana Borja 3%, Rogelio Espinoza none, and 46% selecting none of the candidates, suggesting the gender disparity did not significantly affect the overall distribution of votes among candidates .
Students supporting Reinerio Vargas in the UAGRM survey cited that he made himself more noticeable than other candidates and was perceived as better prepared for the position, which they believed would guarantee progress for the university. His visibility and perceived preparedness were key factors influencing the votes he received .
The candidates in the UAGRM elections faced significant challenges regarding visibility, as indicated by the survey results where 46% of respondents chose 'Ninguno de los candidatos.' This indicates a broad lack of awareness or understanding among students about who the candidates were and what they stood for. Suggestions from the survey results indicated that candidates needed to improve their outreach and communication of their projects and plans so that students could better recognize their potential contributions to the university .
The high percentage of respondents voting 'Ninguno de los candidatos' in the UAGRM elections indicates a substantial disengagement or dissatisfaction among the student body with the candidate options. This could reflect a broader skepticism or disconnect between the electoral process and the students' perceived relevance of the candidates to their concerns and needs. It highlights the necessity for candidates to better engage with students and communicate the potential impacts of their leadership .
A significant portion of the surveyed students, 46%, chose 'Ninguno de los candidatos' because they believed the candidates were not apt for the position or they did not know the candidates' proposals. This lack of awareness about the candidates' plans and potential contributions to the university influenced their decision to vote for none of them. Additionally, many respondents expressed not knowing the candidates at all .