Notes
Notes
A husband and wife can file a joint return even if the spouses have
different accounting methods (cash or accrual) in different parts of the tax
return.
Since the home equity loan secured by Brown of $20,000 was used to
purchase a car, it does not meet the requirements of acquisition
indebtedness and as such, any interest paid on the loan would be
considered nondeductble interest.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) allows taxpayers a deduction for
qualified business income (QBI) from a qualified trade or business
operated directly or through a pass-through entity.
Starting 2018, in addition to standard OR itemized deductions, taxpayers
are allowed to deduct from AGI:
20% of Qualified Business Income from Qualified trade / business.
(+) 20% of Qualified REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) dividends.
(+) 20% of Qualified PTP (Publicly Traded Partnership) income.
Eligible taxpayers may be entitled to a deduction of up to 20 percent of
QBI from a domestic business operated as a sole proprietorship or through
a partnership, S corporation, trust or estate. Income earned through a C
corporation or by providing services as an employee is not eligible for the
deduction.
QBI is the net amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction and
loss from any qualified trade or business and excludes: Investment items
such as capital gains or losses, dividends or interest income, wage income,
foreign income that is not effectively connected with the conduct of
business within the US, certain commodities transactions or foreign
currency gains or losses, reasonable compensation from an S corporation,
guaranteed payments from a partnership.
Thus, income received as guaranteed payments from S corporation are not
generally considered as wages and not allowable for the qualified business
deduction.
Common Notes
1) All participants must be employees who must have at least one year
of service
5) The plan does not allow contribution towards benefits that defer pay,
except for 401(k) plans.
Dependency exemptions have been suspended, as per the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Acts, from 2018. (Prior to TCJA, a taxpayer was able to claim
dependency exemption for self and for each dependent on the tax return
(subject to AGI limitations) which reduced the taxable income before
computation of tax.) Thus, a taxpayer cannot claim dependency
exemptions anymore.
An individual is not required to file a return if income is less than then the
standard deduction.
Note: Even though the individual need not file a tax return, it is still
advised to do so to get a refund of any federal income tax withheld or if
there is any refundable credit (such as earned income credit, additional
child tax credit, american opportunity credit).
(i) Benefit does not extend beyond 12 months after the first date of receipt
of benefit
AND
(ii) Benefit does not extend beyond the end of the taxable year following
the taxable year in which the payment is made.
Mid quarter convention is used for property other than real estate property
if more than 40% of the property placed during the year has been done in
the last quarter (and not 50%). Thus, statement II is untrue.
Bonus (first year) depreciation of 100% is allowable as a deduction for new
/ used qualified property placed in the business during the year. As per the
law, a taxpayer is required to claim bonus depreciation unless they elect
out. The “election out” is made on an asset recovery class basis.
Taxpayers may have any number of reasons for electing out, including
avoiding the expiration of income tax credits or net operating losses.
A C corporation is the only entity among the given list that has flexibility in
adopting an accounting period that it chooses. An accounting period or
taxable year can be:
3.2. Income
Under the LIFO method the last of item inventory purchased is the first
one to be sold. Therefore, the ending inventory or the inventory on hand
will consist of goods that were acquired the earliest. In period of rising
prices if the cost of most recently acquired goods are included in the cost
of sales, the overall cost of sales would increase resulting in lower taxable
income under the LIFO method when compared to the FIFO method. Lower
taxable income means lower tax liability than the FIFO method.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 introduced 100% dividend received
deduction (DRD) on the foreign-source portion of dividends received from
a specified foreign corporation to encourage US MNC’s to repatriate
foreign-earned income back to the U.S. Thus, statement I is correct.
Dividend from domestic corporations were eligible for DRD even in under
the prior law. However, under the TCJA, the amount of deduction has been
revised as below:
- 50% DRD for dividends from less-than-20%-owned domestic
corporations.
- 65% DRD for dividends from 20%-or-more-owned domestic corporations.
Thus, statement II is incorrect as the DRD on dividend from domestic
corporations is not 80%.
Global Intangible low taxed income (GILTI) is the pro-rata share of excess
CFC income over the CFC’s “net deemed tangible income return” {sort-of
penalty imposed by TCJA for generating excessive returns on foreign CFCs
which is generally achieved by migrating intangible assets offshore}. GILTI
is eligible for upto 50% deduction as per Section 250.
Thus, statement III is also incorrect because special deduction on GILTI is
50% and not 100%.
The tax law allows cash basis of accounting for small businesses that have
average annual gross receipts of $29 million or less (Limit for the year)
during the preceding three years. Further, it allows the cash basis
taxpayers to not use accrual method for valuing inventories (unlike prior
law when even cash basis taxpayers were required to use accrual method
for inventories).
A taxpayer with gross receipts $28 million in the prior year and $47 million
for the two years prior will have total gross receipts of $75 million (and
average of $25 million) for the three preceding years. Such taxpayer can
use cash basis if the average gross receipts of the three preceding years is
less than or equal to $29 million (for the year).
In general, when contribution of inventory is made to a qualified
organization, the amount of charitable contribution deduction is equal to
the lower of fair market value or tax basis of the property
donated. However, if the cost of donated inventory isn't included in the
corporation's opening inventory, the inventory's basis is zero and a
charitable contribution deduction cannot be claimed. Therefore, in order to
take a charitable deduction, corporations must include the purchase price
of the inventory bought and donated in the same year in the cost of goods
sold for that year.
3.3. Deductions
C corporations are only allowed to amortize and deduct organizational
expenses such as state fees of incorporation, accounting and legal costs
incidental to incorporation, temporary director fees and organizational
meeting expenses. Stock issuance costs such as printing and underwriting
commissions are never deductible and must be capitalized.
No Notes
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) provides a 20% qualified business
income (QBI) deduction to individuals with respect to business income
from sole proprietorship as well as pass through income from
partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs) and S corporations. This
deduction is not available for C Corporations.
Corporations that file a short year tax return (taxable period of less than
12 months), must determine taxes for that period by annualizing the
income. The following are the steps involved:
1) Annualize the taxable income for the short period by multiplying by
12 and dividing by number of months in the short period.
2) Determine tax liability for the annualized income.
3) Compute the tax liability for the short period by multiplying the
annualized tax liability with the number of months in the short period and
dividing by 12.
4.1. S - Corporations
An S-corporation has two types of income:
- Separately Stated Items which are amounts that can hit a limit on the
shareholder's individual tax return
Items which can alter the tax liability of shareholder, if taken into account
by them on their personal tax returns, are required to be states separately.
Item not required to be separately stated (e.g., amortization of
organizational expenditures), are combined at corporate level, and a net
amount of ordinary income or loss is passed through. So here,
amortization of organizational expenditure of $865 will be deducted as
ordinary expenses on Windmills tax return.
A shareholder's at-risk basis is the sum of money and the adjusted basis of
property contributed, pro-rata share of pass-thru income and losses and
amount borrowed and lent to the corporation for which the shareholder is
personally liable for repayment. Any excess of shareholder’s pro-rata
share of pass-thru losses for the tax year over his/her amount at risk at
the close of the tax year is not deductible.
From the given choices, interest and dividend are separately stated
income items that increase the balance in the AAA account.
4.2. Partnership
A partnership distribution can either be liquidating or non-liquidating.
Liquidating partnership distributions imply that the partner is no longer
going to be associated with the partnership. Non-liquidating distributions
can either be current or partial distributions that do not terminate the
interest of the partner.
The fact pattern of this question does not indicate if the payment of
$12,500 proportionate to Brown's interest ($25,000 x 50%) is related to
partial or full liquidation. Therefore, it can be assumed as a current
distribution, i.e., non-taxable return of capital as partners pay tax on
partnership income when earned and not when distributed.
(1) Tax-Basis: Losses can be deducted only to the extent of partner's tax
basis.
(2) At-risk: A partner is at-risk to the extent of cash & property contributed
into the activity, amounts borrowed with respect to the activity and is
personally liable for and qualified non-recourse financing and the pro-rata
share of income each year.
Any losses that are not currently deducted, can be carried forward until
utilized in other years or complete disposition of partnership interest.
Sec 501 of the Internal Revenue Code provides for certain organizations to
be exempt from federal income taxes. Sec 501(c) (3) describes the type of
organizations that are exempt and includes corporations, funds and
foundations that are organized and operated exclusively for charitable or
religious [not being political] purposes and whose net earnings do not
benefit any private shareholder or individual. Therefore, a partnership may
not qualify for federal tax exemption under Sec 501(c)(3).
5.1. Federal Taxation Recapitulation
<<No Notes>>
Revenue procedures deal with the internal practice and procedures of the
IRS in the administration of the tax laws.
The FBAR filing requirement applies to all U.S. persons who have a
financial interest in or signature authority over foreign financial accounts
AND if the aggregate value of those accounts exceeds $10,000 at any
time during the calendar year. This includes accounts held jointly with non-
U.S. persons. The requirement to file an FBAR does not differentiate based
on the nationality of the other account holders; instead, it focuses on the
aggregate value of the accounts and the U.S. person's relationship to
those accounts. Therefore, the total of $12,000 across all three accounts
necessitates FBAR reporting.
Most notably, the plaintiff need not demonstrate that the auditor’s work
was deficient; the law presumes that the audit must have been deficient
due to the material misstatements. Instead of the plaintiff having to prove
that he relied upon the information, the auditor needs to prove that the
plaintiff did not rely.
When the IRS seeks client records from a CPA who is not in possession of
the same, the CPA can notify the IRS of the identity of any person who is
believed to have the records. Additionally, the CPA may make reasonable
inquiries with the client about the third party who may have the
information.
The IRS does not impose a penalty on a CPA for making an error in
calculating a tax return; unless the error resulted from the preparer's
negligence, there is no penalty for an honest mistake.
When sued for negligence, a CPA will be liable to anyone in privity (client),
intended third party beneficiary or anyone known and foreseen by the CPA
(example a shareholder). Therefore, when a CPA negligently gives an
opinion on the financial statements, he would be liable to a third party that
he knows would rely on the opinion.
Common law principles to establish negligence requires that there be
privity of contract between the accountant and the plaintiff. Generally, the
parties in privity are the client and the intended third party beneficiary. An
accountant can use lack of privity as a viable defence against a client's
creditor on the premise that the creditor was not the intended beneficiary
and was not specifically identified by the client.
The Internal Revenue Code is the basic foundation of federal tax laws and
represents a codification of the federal tax laws of the United States. It is
the official "consolidation and codification of the general and permanent
laws of the United States," as the Code's preface explains. Since it is law,
it has the greatest authority.
A partner in a CPA partnership firm is an owner of the firm and not a third
party. Therefore, on the death of one of the partners, the CPA partnership
can provide its working papers to any surviving partner. This can be done
legally and without the client’s consent.
A CPA cannot accept contingent fees from clients in case of the following
services: audit or review of the financial statements, Compilation of
financial statements expected to be relied upon by a third party, or
examination of prospective financial information. In addition, a contingent
fee cannot be accepted for the preparation of an initial or amended tax
return. However, a contingent fee may be accepted if fixed by courts,
other public authorities, or in tax matters if based on the results of judicial
proceedings.
The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct has very strict rules around the
acceptance of contingent fees, commissions, and referral fees. From the
given choices, only fees such as commission or referral fees paid to the
CPA for recommending a product or service such as a computer system
are allowed, provided the CPA does not provide audit or attest services.
Information obtained by the auditor during the audit is confidential but not
privileged. Hence in majority of the states, where common law prevails,
the auditor must comply with a subpoena from a court. However, some
states have enacted privilege statutes, which allow the accountant to
refuse to honor a court subpoena. Hence Silo will be able to prevent Pym
from testifying in such states where a statute has been enacted creating
such a privilege and provided Silo has not waived such privilege and the
purpose of privilege is to protect the accountant and not client.
Mergers is one company absorbing another and becoming liable for all
obligations of the acquired corporation. A merger can be effected by
giving some parties cash or property. Receipt of voting stock by all
stockholders of the original corporations is not a necessity.
A general partner of a limited partnership is responsible for the
management of the partnership and has unlimited liabilities. A general
partner can also be a creditor of the partnership, whether secured or
unsecured.
Limited Liability Company (LLC) is unique in the sense that it enjoys both
the benefits if a partnership as well as a Corporation. It is created formally
like a Corporation where members have limited liability and functions like
a partnership where taxes are paid at member level via pass-through
income instead of the corporation paying taxes. An added benefit when
compared to S Corporation is that, unlike S Corp. which pays tax on
distribution of appreciated property, the distribution of appreciated
property to members of LLC is tax-free.
7.1. Contracts
In common law contract both the parties to the contract must provide
some consideration for it to be valid. If only one side has obligations, the
contract is not valid. Additionally, consideration must be “of value” (or
legally sufficient), and be “bargained for”. It is assumed that the
consideration is fair because it resulted from a bargain between two
parties.
Under the personal services contract, the party's duty will be discharged if
there is illegality of the services to be performed.
The statute of limitation provides time period within which the aggrieved
party can bring an action against defaulting party for breach of contract.
Upon expiration of the stipulated period, the defaulting party may demand
performance, however the right to judicial remedies of the aggrieved party
extinguishes.
The statute of limitations for an action for breach of contract begins after
the date of breach and is generally four to six years.
Under the Documents of Title Article 7 of the UCC, the common carrier
may limit the liability or add a provision in the contract to cap the liability
to a specific fixed dollar amount, provided it is reasonable and agreed to
by the parties
In a shipment contract the title and risk of loss transfers to the buyer when
goods have been properly transferred to the carrier (usually a trucking) at
the seller’s [Link] that the references to F.O.B. (free on board) and
F.A.S. (free along side) are to indicate that the transfer of ownership occurs
when the goods are loaded onto the truck or placed on the loading dock
next to the [Link], the title to the radios passes to Lazur at the
time they are delivered to the carrier, even if the goods are
nonconforming.
Where the provision for liquidated damages is not explicitly stated in the
contract, the injured party may recover only the reasonable amount of the
anticipated loss. The seller may retain the lesser of $500 or 20% of the
contract price.
7.3. Secured Transactions (UCC Article 9)
Attachment to the collateral can happen when all three conditions are
satisfied (Mnemonic: PIC): (1) Property is owned by debtor i.e. debtor has
rights to the property; (2) Interest is created either through a signed
agreement or by creditor taking possession and (3) Creditor has given
value to the debtor.
Under the Secured Transaction Article of the UCC, a debtor must sign a
written agreement for the security interest to be enforceable (Mnemonic:
PIC). However such written security agreement is not required if the
collateral is in the possession of the secured party.
7.4. Bankruptcy
A chapter 11 reorganization pal must make provision to pay for the
administrative expenses to the court. This amount may be paid in
installments. The debtors must be aware that failure to pay for the
administrative fees may result in dismissal of the case.
Chapter 7 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code will deny a debt discharge when
the debtor is artificial persons such as corporations and partnerships,
though they can participate in the Chapter 7 liquidation process.
The trustee is given the power to maximize the property included in the
debtor’s estate by avoiding or setting aside certain transfers to maximize
the corpus available to the creditors. (Mnemonic: FAST). Statutory liens
that become effective after the bankruptcy petition is filed, can be set
aside by the trustee. However, a trustee may not set aside liens that were
effective before the bankruptcy petition was filed.
A debtor need not be insolvent to file for voluntary petition under Chapter
7 bankruptcy proceedings. Hence, there is no requirement to show that
the debtor’s liabilities exceed the fair value of assets while filing such a
[Link], under the Bankruptcy Abuse and Protection Act of 2005,
“means test” is used to determine if individual debtors may file under
Chapter 7. If the debtor has income above certain thresholds, petition may
be dismissed or the debtor may proceed under Chapter 11 or 13
(applicable to individuals only).
7.6. Agency
Generally, an employer-employee relationship is an agency relationship
where, the employee acts on behalf of the employer and has certain
express and fiduciary duties (loyalty, obedience, reasonable care, duty to
account). Respondent Superior is a common-law doctrine that makes an
employer liable for the actions (torts) of an employee when the actions
take place within the scope of the employment.
Important sums
QBID
Haden Kacin (aged 32) is married and files a joint tax return with his wife
María Guadalupe. Haden is a shareholder in an S Corp. S Corp holds no
qualified property. Haden's share of S Corp’s QBI is $300,000 in the current
year and his share of W-2 wages from S Corp is $40,000. Maria earns
wages from employment by an unrelated company. After allowable
deductions unrelated to the S Corp, Haden and Maria’s taxable income for
the current year is $424,200. What is the amount of qualified business
income deduction that the couple can claim on their Form 1040?
Assume that the threshold limit are as follows:
Lower Limits - $182,100 for single & others / $364,200 for MFJ
Upper Limits - $232,100 for single & others / $464,200 for MFJ
Answer:
Haden and Maria are eligible for Qualified Business Income Deduction
(QBID) based on their income from the S Corporation (Note: Assume
income from S Corp is from Qualified Trade or Business, unless otherwise
specified).
In this case, for MFJ status, as the taxable income of $424,200 exceeds the
threshold of $364,200 but is within $464,200 ( the upper limit for MFJ filing
status), the QBID deduction is limited.
(i) Reduction ratio = (Taxable Income – Lower Threshold for MFJ) >(ii)
Excess amount = 20% of QBI less the wage and property limitation. The
wage and property limitation is computed as the greater of:
(a) 50% of wages from qualified trade or business or (b) 25% of wages
plus 2.5% of the unadjusted basis qualified property from the qualified
trade or business
Step 1: Calculate Reduction Ratio:
Triage Corporation has total income of $550,000 during year 2018. In the
same year, ordinary deductions are $400,000. It also has a net operating
loss of $30,000 carried forward from year 2016 and it accrued qualified
charitable contributions of $4,000. It also had $15,000 disallowed carried
forward charitable contribution from year 2013. What is the amount of
charitable contribution that can be carried forward to year 2019?
Answer:
Charitable contributions made by corporations are allowable upto a
maximum deduction of 10% of income less ordinary deductions (before
deduction of the charitable contribution, capital loss or net operating loss
(NOL) “carryback” and special deductions). Capital loss carry forward and
net operating loss carry forward are deducted for calculating the 10%
income limit. However, accrued charitable contributions are deductible
only if paid by the due date for filing the corporation’s tax return.
Any amount not allowed due to the 10% limit is allowed to carry forward
for 5 years.
Amoun
Particulars
t
$550,0
Total income
00
400,00
Less: Ordinary deductions
0
150,00
0
Less: Net operating loss carried forward 30,000
Base to calculate 10% of limit for $120,0
charitable deduction 00
Charitable deduction is allowable upto $12,000 (i.e. $120,000 x 10%).
In case of prior year, charity contribution carried forward, first the current
year charity contribution is deducted then the carried forward is deducted.
Amou
Particulars
nt
$12,0
Maximum 10% limit
00
Less: Deduction for 2018
-
(only accrued)
Less: Charity deduction $12,0
carried forward 00
Balance $0
$4,000 for the year 2018 is not eligible for deduction as it is accrued and
no information is provided if paid or not by the tax return filing date.
$3,000 balance from 2013 is not allowed for carry over as the maximum
carry forward limit is only 5 years for charitable deduction.
Limitation period
Jackson Corp., a calendar year corporation, mailed its year 3 tax return to
the Internal Revenue Service by certified mail on Friday, April 8, year
2018. The return, postmarked April 8, 2018, was delivered to the Internal
Revenue Service on April 12, 2018. The statute of limitations on Jackson's
corporate tax return begins on (Note: April 15th was a Sunday and April
16th was a legal holiday)
Answer:
Since Jackson Corp., is a calendar year corporation, the tax return is due
on April 17 of 2018 (Note: If the due falls on a legal holiday or weekend,
the tax return is due on the next business day). Accordingly, the statute of
limitations for examining Jackson Corp's return begins on April 17, 2018,
which is the later of filing date of April 8, 2018.
Particulars Amount
($100,00
Net passive losses
0)
($850,00
0)
Assume that the Excess Business Loss limitation as $289k for single
taxpayers and $578k for MFJ.
What is the total amount of loss that Victor can carry forward to later tax
years?
Answer
Non-corporate taxpayers are allowed to offset business losses up to
$289,000/$578,000 for joint filers in the tax year from other sources of taxable
income. The remaining are ‘excess business losses’ that can be carried forward
to the future years indefinitely [carry back not allowed] and are subject to the 80
percent taxable income limitation of the carry forward year [Exception: Farming
losses are allowed a 2-year carry back].
Passive losses can be offset only with passive income and unadjusted losses can
be carried forward indefinitely.
In the given case, Victor's pass thru loss from S Corp would be an ordinary loss
and therefore can be used to offset salary income. As a single filer, Victor, would
be able to offset $289,000 of S Corp losses from salary income and will carry
forward the remaining $461,000 to the future years for indefinite period. His
taxable salary income after the offset will be $111,000 ($400,000 - $289,000).
Also, in absence of passive income, net passive losses of $100,000 will be
suspended and carried forward to the future years. Therefore, a total of $561,000
of losses will be carried forward to the later tax years.
Frank, a married (filing jointly) taxpayer income and loss details for the
current year are as follows:
Particulars Amount
Taxable salary $900,000
($1,750,00
0)
What is the amount of loss that Frank must carry forward to future tax
years?
Before calculating the excess business loss, the at-risk limitations and passive
activity limits are applied. The at-risk rules relate to the investments in an
activity while passive rules relate to the taxpayer’s participation in the activity. To
determine the maximum amount of loss allowed for a year, an at-risk limitation
is applied first to each activity and then passive loss limitation is applied to all
losses from all passive activities to determine the amount of loss deductible for
the year.
In the given case, net business losses are $400,000 and pass-thru losses from S
Corp are $1,350,000. Unless indicated otherwise, losses from S Corp are passive.
Further, as no information is provided with respect to the taxpayer’s basis in an S
Corp, we assume the basis is large enough to cover the losses, however, as there
is no other passive income, the entire $1,350,000 loss from S Corp would be
carried forward to the future years to be offset against the passive income only.
$400,000 (<$524,000 limit for MFJ for 2021) of business losses on the other hand
can offset taxable salary leaving the taxable income as $500,000 ($900,000 -
$400,000).
Accordingly, the total amount of loss that Frank will carry forward to the future
years would be $1,350,000.
AAA / AEP
Smart Corp., a calendar-year corporation, was formed in 20X1 and made an S
corporation election in 20X3 that is still in effect. Its books and records for Year
20X6 reflect the following information:
Accumulated earnings and profits at 1/1/X6 $90,000
Accumulated adjustments account at 1/1/X6 $50,000
Ordinary income for Year 20X6 $200,000
Smart Corp. is solely owned by Roget, whose basis in Smart’s stock was
$100,000 on January 1, 20X6. During 20X6, Smart distributed $310,000 to Roger.
What is the amount of the $310,000 distribution that Roger must report as
dividend income for 20X6 assuming no special elections were made with regard
to the distribution?
AEP / AAA
Benny Corporation, a calendar year S corporation, voluntarily terminates its S
corporation status on June 30, 2018. Its accumulated adjustment account on that
date was $45,000. During the rest of the year the Company earned $45,000. In
year 2019, Benny Corporation earned $60,000. It distributed $30,000 in
December 2018 and $60,000 on December 1, 2019. What is the amount of
distribution that is not taxable to Benny’s shareholders for both the years?
Answer
A distribution from S Corporation to its shareholders are made either from AAA
and/or AEP. Accumulated Adjustments Account (AAA) is the S corporation income
that has already been taxed to shareholders but not yet distributed; so AAA
distribution is non-taxable. Accumulated earnings and profits (AEP) is the earning
and profits (E&P) accumulated in C corporation years that have never been taxed
to shareholders, so AEP distribution is taxable as dividend income.
The internal revenue code provides that when a S corporation is converted into a
C corporation, any distributions within the post transition termination period
(PTTP) are considered to be from the AAA of the S corporation (and will not be
taxable).
PTTP begins on the day of termination and ends on the later of (1) one year after
the termination date, or (2) the due date for filing the final S Corporation tax
return (including extensions).
The general rule is that if the company cannot distribute all AAA during the PTTP,
remaining AAA essentially [Link], post the TCJA Act an exception
applies wherein, certain S Corporations can treat distributions following the PTTP
as proportionally paid from AAA and from Accumulated E&P.
The above exception applies only to S Corporations that revoke S Corporation
status within 2 years of enactment of this new law i.e. December 22, 2017 and
share ownership on date of revocation that is identical to that on the date of the
law’s enacment.
Benny terminated S corporation on June 30, 2018 which is within 2 years of the
enactment of the new law and as no information is provided regarding change of
ownership, we can assume that tje ownership on the date of revocation is
identical to the ownership on the date of the law's enactment.
The Post Transition Termination Period (PTTP) begins from July 1, 2018 and ends
later of June 30, 2019 or September 15, 2019 (filing due date including
extensions) i.e. September 15, 2019. Therefore,
(i) distribution of $30,000 in December 2018 is within PTTP and is considered to
be from AAA and not taxable.
(ii) distribution of $60,000 in December 2019 is after PTTP and is considered to
be proportionately from AAA and AEP.
AAA balance on December 31, 2019 = $45,000- $30,000 (distribution on
December 2018) = $15,000.
AEP balance on December 31, 2019 = Earnings of 2018 $45,000 + earnings of
2019 $60,000 = $105,000.
Non-taxable portion of the $60,000 distribution in 2019 =$60,000 x
$15,000/$120,000 = $7,500.
(iii) the total amount of $37,500 (i.e. $30,000 + $7,500) is not taxable.
(Remaining $52,500 of $60,000 distribution is made from AEP. and is taxable to
the shareholder as dividend income)
1. Lauren is paid by that office a total gross salary of $3,000 for such
services.
2. Lauren's total gross salary during Year 1 amounts to $3,250, of which
$2,625 is received in Year 1 and $625, is received in Year 2.
Answer
A non-resident alien who performs personal services in the US, is
considered to be engaged in trade or business in the US (The term trade
or business within the United States includes the performance of
personal services within a taxable year). A non-resident alien who
performs personal services within the U.S. is considered to be engaged in
a U.S. trade or business, except:
(1) when the individual's stay in the U.S. is for 90 days or less during the
tax year,
(3) the non-resident alien works for either a foreign personal who is not
engaged in a U.S trade or business, or the foreign office of a U.S. person
(called foreign employer).
However, if all three conditions are not met then the income would be
considered U.S source income and taxed.
In situation I, all three conditions are met, Lauren's presence in the U.S
was not for more than 90 days; she was working with a foreign employer
(London office of the U.S. partnership); and Lauren's total gross salary did
not exceed $3,000. Therefore, she will not be considered as engaged in
U.S trade or business for Year 1.
With respect to the federal tax law, list the following tax authorities as per
weight of their authority from highest to lowest:
Judicial Authorities
Revenue Rulings
U.S. Treasury Regulations
Revenue Procedures
U.S. Internal Revenue Code
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) holds the most authoritative value in the
federal tax law followed by Treasury Regulations, Judicial decisions on tax
matters, Revenue Rulings and Revenue Procedures.
Judicial authorities’ decisions also interpret the IRC but do not have similar
authority as IRC. Generally, the decision of the higher court is accorded
more weight.
Revenue rulings are official interpretations by the IRS of the IRC of how the
code and regulations apply to a specific fact/ situation and can be relied
upon by a taxpayer and guide the taxpayer in a similar situation. Revenue
rulings may be cited as authority.
Revenue procedures outline procedures for complying with the tax law.
They are official statement of procedures relating to the sections of the
IRC, its related statutes, tax treaties and regulations and generally guide
the taxpayers on the tax procedures.
A single-member LLC is treated as a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes unless it elects to be treated as a corporation, meaning no separate federal tax return is required. If a partnership tax return is filed mistakenly, the current CPA must prepare the correct return for the subsequent year and advise the client of the prior error, although it is ultimately the taxpayer's decision to correct the mistake .
The IRS normally has 3 years from the tax return's due or filing date to propose adjustments. This period extends to 6 years if there is an omission greater than 25% of gross income, while fraud or non-filing allows for unlimited extension. Without findings of fraud or substantial errors, retrospective adjustments are typically limited to the 3-year period .
Lack of privity can serve as a viable defense for a CPA against negligence claims by clients' creditors, as the CPA may argue that the creditor was not the intended beneficiary and was not specifically identified by the client. Generally, common law requires privity of contract between the accountant and the plaintiff, limiting the CPA's liability to the client and intended third party beneficiaries .
A CPA may rely on client-provided information unless it is plainly incorrect or incomplete; however, failure to make reasonable inquiries, such as verifying business travel expenses, can result in penalties. The CPA must exercise due diligence to prevent liability and align with AICPA guidelines on tax practice responsibility .
Most states require auditors to comply with court subpoenas, but certain states allow them to refuse under privilege statutes that protect the accountant. A CPA can exercise this privilege unless it is waived by the client or the statute specifically applies only to protect the accountant rather than the client .
Under IRC section 6695, a penalty of $600 per check is imposed on a tax return preparer who endorses or otherwise negotiates a taxpayer's IRS refund check, highlighting the importance of professional boundaries in handling client funds .
A CPA should consider the importance of the transaction, the technical complexity involved, the potential penalties associated with the tax return position, and the client's tax sophistication when deciding whether to communicate tax advice in writing or orally according to AICPA standards .
The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct restricts CPAs from accepting contingent fees for services such as audits, reviews, and tax return preparation, unless fixed by courts or public authorities. Contingent fees are permissible in cases involving judicial proceedings or based on regulatory outcomes, thereby maintaining integrity and objectivity in practice .
The IRS statute of limitations on examining a tax return begins on the later of the return's due date or actual filing date; for Jackson Corp., as the due date fell on a holiday weekend, the statute began on the next business day, April 17, 2018 .
Under Treasury Department Circular 230 (10.21), a CPA must promptly advise the client of the error or omission on a previously filed tax return and also advise the client about the potential consequences of such noncompliance, error, or omission .