Written  Report  Evaluation  Criteria  

Score Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor
100% (A, B) 75% (C) 50% (D) 25% (E)
Given Max
15 Presentation is clear and logical. Presentation is generally clear. Reader can follow presentation Presentation is very confused and
Reader can easily follow line of Sentence flow is generally smooth. A with effort. Structure not well unclear. Reader cannot follow it or
Structure
reasoning. Logical connection of few minor points confusing or not thought out. Points are deduce the main points presented.
points. clearly connected. not clearly made.
10 Level is appropriate for presentation Level is generally appropriate. Enough errors in style or grammar Writing style is consistently at an
of scientific results. Writing is free of Writing is generally error-free, but occur that they become distracting. inappropriate level. Errors are
errors in grammar, punctuation, and some errors in language or grammar Voice may change randomly. May frequent and distracting, so that it is
Style
spelling. may occur. appear disjointed. hard to determine meaning. No
Flows smoothly. logical connection of ideas or flow of
sentences.
25 Show considerable critical thinking Generally shows critical thinking Show some critical thinking. Lack Significant lack of critical thinking
about information acquired from skills. Able to provide some critical of consistency in critical evaluation and perspective. Little independent
various sources. Able to critically evaluation /discussion of of information and viewpoints. thinking and conclusions. Authors
Critical discuss and independently evaluate information. Generally appropriate Discussion and independent accept viewpoints of others without
perspective information and to come to own conclusions are drawn from it. Some conclusions are inadequate. critical consideration. Abundant
conclusions. assertions may lack support. May Significant logical errors are logical errors.
contain some minor mistakes, no present.
significant errors are made.
25 Introduction contains pertinent Gives general information about the Insufficient information on Provides little or no information on
background information. Given tasks topic, but some relevant information background, relevance, background and significance.
and questions are thoroughly analyzed may be missing, or significance is not significance is given. Some Information is inaccurate or with
Content and elaborated. Results and clearly explained. Description of information is accurate, but enough many errors. Discussion is very
conclusions are logically constructed results is generally clear. No errors are made to be distracting. difficult to follow. Reader learns
and summarized. Information is significant errors made. little.
consistently accurate.
10 Strong supplement to the text. Provide good supplementary Difficult to understand. Do not No figures or tables are used, or they
Use of Information is clearly presented. If information, but may be somewhat stand alone; text must be consulted are so poorly prepared that they
figures and taken from other sources, appropriate lacking in clarity, appropriate to figure out what is being detract from the presentation or do
tables reference is given. Can stand alone reference, or explanation. presented. Inadequately referenced. not illustrate the points made in the
without reference to text. text.
15 References to appropriate scientific Appropriate references are used and Minimal numbers of references are No references provided.
References articles are properly cited in the text cited, but some may be incomplete or used. Style is incorrect and/or
and listed in proper format. in incorrect style. incomplete.
% of
100%