feat: implement referencing next styles & improve fill handling#7482
feat: implement referencing next styles & improve fill handling#7482davidkna wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
3 issues found across 5 files
Confidence score: 3/5
- There is some merge risk due to two medium-severity, high-confidence rendering issues in
src/config.rsandsrc/module.rs, so this is not quite in the “safe with minimal risk” range yet. - In
src/config.rs, reference color resolution appears to clear existing fg/bg when only one side ofStyleRefsis present, which can cause boundary segments to lose fallback colors and display incorrectly. - In
src/module.rs, adjacent fill segments may readnext_*styles from trailing text rather than the immediate next segment, creating incorrect style transitions between segments. - Pay close attention to
src/config.rs,src/module.rs- style resolution and next-segment lookup can misapply colors at segment boundaries.
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="docs/advanced-config/README.md">
<violation number="1" location="docs/advanced-config/README.md:669">
P3: Fix duplicated wording in the new style-token documentation (`can not be be`).</violation>
</file>
<file name="src/config.rs">
<violation number="1" location="src/config.rs:337">
P2: Reference color resolution clears existing fg/bg when only one side of `StyleRefs` is present, causing boundary segments to lose fallback colors.</violation>
</file>
<file name="src/module.rs">
<violation number="1" location="src/module.rs:259">
P2: Adjacent fill segments can resolve `next_*` styles from trailing text instead of the immediate next segment.</violation>
</file>
Shadow auto-approve: would not auto-approve because issues were found.
Re-trigger cubic
Co-Authored-By: Christophe Henry <christophehenry@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cubic-dev-ai[bot] <191113872+cubic-dev-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
0 issues found across 1 file (changes from recent commits).
Shadow auto-approve: would require human review. This PR modifies core rendering logic by adding next-style references and overhauling fill-segment width handling, which impacts style propagation across all modules and increases the risk of subtle bugs in prompt layout and color output.
Re-trigger cubic
Co-authored-by: cubic-dev-ai[bot] <191113872+cubic-dev-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
0 issues found across 1 file (changes from recent commits).
Shadow auto-approve: would not auto-approve. Auto-approval blocked by 1 unresolved issue from previous reviews.
Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
0 issues found across 1 file (changes from recent commits).
Shadow auto-approve: would require human review. This PR introduces significant changes to core styling and fill logic across multiple files, including new concept of next segment style references and refactored fill handling, which has a broad blast radius and could affect how all modules render; human review is needed to ensure correctness...
Re-trigger cubic
Description
I also added some changes to
$fillhandling. Unlike #7381 next-segment styles are only read one-step ahead.Motivation and Context
Closes #7381
Closes #5059
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist: